eviden-logo

Evidian > Products > SafeKit: Simple, Cost-Effective High Availability Software > Active active cluster with real-time replication

Active active cluster with real-time replication

Evidian SafeKit

How the active active cluster with real-time replication works?

Active- active cluster with real-time replication

Applications are running on two servers in mutual failover. Each server is backup of the other server. And each application works on its own replicated file directories.

SafeKit active active cluster with real-time replication

If one server fails in an active active cluster, all applications will be active on the same server. After restart of the failed server, applications will return to run on their default primary server.

How it works?

The SafeKit active active cluster is simply configured by deploying two mirror modules with real-time replication. Each mirror module contains its own configuration of virtual IP address, real-time replicated directories and restart scripts.

Note that:

  • the 2 applications Appli1 and Appli2 must be installed on each server for application failover,
  • this architecture is not reduced to 2 applications: N application modules can be deployed on 2 servers with a maximum of 25 modules,
  • each mirror module will have its own virtual IP address, its own replicated file directories and its own recovery scripts.

Example of an active active cluster

The Hyper-V or KVM solution with replication, automatic failover and load balancing of VMs is an example of an active-active cluster with N mirror modules replicating N virtual machines between two physical servers.

In this configuration, a mirror module replicates a full virtual machine and restarts the virtual machine in case of failure.

There is no virtual IP address in such a module because restarting a VM on a server makes automatically the failover of the VM physical IP address.

And a critical application is installed inside a VM in this architecture.

How the SafeKit mirror cluster works with Windows or Linux?

Step 1. Real-time replication

Server 1 (PRIM) runs the Windows or Linux application. Clients are connected to a virtual IP address. SafeKit replicates in real time modifications made inside files through the network.

File replication at byte level in a mirror Windows or Linux cluster

The replication is synchronous with no data loss on failure contrary to asynchronous replication.
You just have to configure the names of directories to replicate in SafeKit. There are no pre-requisites on disk organization. Directories may be located in the system disk.

Step 2. Automatic failover

When Server 1 fails, Server 2 takes over. SafeKit switches the virtual IP address and restarts the Windows or Linux application automatically on Server 2.
The application finds the files replicated by SafeKit uptodate on Server 2. The application continues to run on Server 2 by locally modifying its files that are no longer replicated to Server 1.

Failover of Windows or Linux in a mirror cluster

The failover time is equal to the fault-detection time (30 seconds by default) plus the application start-up time.

Step 3. Automatic failback

Failback involves restarting Server 1 after fixing the problem that caused it to fail.
SafeKit automatically resynchronizes the files, updating only the files modified on Server 2 while Server 1 was halted.

Failback in a mirror Windows or Linux cluster

Failback takes place without disturbing the Windows or Linux application, which can continue running on Server 2.

Step 4. Back to normal

After reintegration, the files are once again in mirror mode, as in step 1. The system is back in high-availability mode, with the Windows or Linux application running on Server 2 and SafeKit replicating file updates to Server 1.

Return to normal operation in a mirror Windows or Linux cluster

If the administrator wishes the application to run on Server 1, he/she can execute a "swap" command either manually at an appropriate time, or automatically through configuration.

SafeKit: High Availability (HA) and Redundancy Choices

What are the two primary choices for ensuring high availability and redundancy?

You can choose between setting up redundancy:

  • At the application level
  • At the virtual machine (VM) level

What is "Redundancy at the application level"?

In this solution, only the application data are replicated. In the event of a failure, only the application is restarted, not the entire operating system or VM.

SafeKit diagram for Application Level High Availability (HA): Illustrates synchronous replication of critical application data between active and passive servers, enabling fast application failover without needing a full VM restart.

Technical Requirements:

  • It requires a technical understanding of the application itself.
  • You must manually define:
    • Which services need to be restarted.
    • The specific application folders that need real-time replication.
    • The configuration of a virtual IP address for failover.

Platform Compatibility:

  • This solution is platform-agnostic.
  • It works inside physical machines, virtual machines, or in the Cloud.
  • Any hypervisor is supported (e.g., VMware, Hyper-V, etc.).
  • More information: Windows, Linux

What is "Redundancy at the virtual machine (VM) level"?

In this solution, the full Virtual Machine (VM) is replicated, including both the Application and the Operating System (OS). In the event of a failure, the full VM is restarted.

SafeKit diagram for Virtual Machine (VM) Level High Availability (HA): Illustrates the full replication of the VM, including the OS and application, between two physical servers to ensure service continuity upon hardware failure.

Key Advantages:

  • It does not require a technical understanding of the application installed within the VM.
  • It is the best solution if you do not know how the application works.
  • You only need to define the location of the VM files.

Platform Compatibility:

  • This solution works with Windows/Hyper-V and Linux/KVM.
  • It does not support VMware for this type of redundancy.
  • This is typically an active/active solution where several virtual machines can be replicated and restarted between two nodes.
  • More information: Windows/Hyper-V, Linux/KVM

Typical usage with SafeKit

Why a replication of a few Tera-bytes?

Resynchronization time after a failure (step 3)

  • 1 Gb/s network ≈ 3 Hours for 1 Tera-bytes.
  • 10 Gb/s network ≈ 1 Hour for 1 Tera-bytes or less depending on disk write performances.

Alternative

Why a replication < 1,000,000 files?

  • Resynchronization time performance after a failure (step 3).
  • Time to check each file between both nodes.

Alternative

  • Put the many files to replicate in a virtual hard disk / virtual machine.
  • Only the files representing the virtual hard disk / virtual machine will be replicated and resynchronized in this case.

Why a failover ≤ 32 replicated VMs?

  • Each VM runs in an independent mirror module.
  • Maximum of 32 mirror modules running on the same cluster.

Alternative

  • Use an external shared storage and another VM clustering solution.
  • More expensive, more complex.

Why a LAN/VLAN network between remote sites?

Alternative

  • Use a load balancer for the virtual IP address if the 2 nodes are in 2 subnets (supported by SafeKit, especially in the cloud).
  • Use backup solutions with asynchronous replication for high latency network.

SafeKit High Availability (HA) Solutions: Quick Installation Guides for Windows and Linux Clusters

This table presents the SafeKit High Availability (HA) solutions, categorized by application and operating environment (Databases, Web Servers, VMs, Cloud). Identify the specific pre‑configured .safe module (e.g., mirror.safe, farm.safe, and others) required for real‑time replication, load balancing, and automatic failover of critical business applications on Windows or Linux. Simplify your HA cluster setup with direct links to quick installation guides, each including a download link for the corresponding .safe module.

A SafeKit .safe module is essentially a pre‑configured High Availability (HA) template that defines how a specific application will be clustered and protected by the SafeKit software. In practice, it contains a configuration file (userconfig.xml) and restart scripts.

SafeKit High Availability (HA) Solutions: Quick Installation Guides (with downloadable .safe modules)
Application Category HA Scenario (High Availability) Technology / Product .safe Module Installation Guide
New Applications Real-Time Replication and Failover Windows mirror.safe View Guide: Windows Replication
New Applications Real-Time Replication and Failover Linux mirror.safe View Guide: Linux Replication
New Applications Network Load Balancing and Failover Windows farm.safe View Guide: Windows Load Balancing
New Applications Network Load Balancing and Failover Linux farm.safe View Guide: Linux Load Balancing
Databases Replication and Failover Microsoft SQL Server sqlserver.safe View Guide: SQL Server Cluster
Databases Replication and Failover PostgreSQL postgresql.safe View Guide: PostgreSQL Replication
Databases Replication and Failover MySQL mysql.safe View Guide: MySQL Cluster
Databases Replication and Failover Oracle oracle.safe View Guide: Oracle Failover Cluster
Databases Replication and Failover Firebird firebird.safe View Guide: Firebird HA
Web Servers Load Balancing and Failover Apache apache_farm.safe View Guide: Apache Load Balancing
Web Servers Load Balancing and Failover IIS iis_farm.safe View Guide: IIS Load Balancing
Web Servers Load Balancing and Failover NGINX farm.safe View Guide: NGINX Load Balancing
VMs and Containers Replication and Failover Hyper-V hyperv.safe View Guide: Hyper-V VM Replication
VMs and Containers Replication and Failover KVM kvm.safe View Guide: KVM VM Replication
VMs and Containers Replication and Failover Docker mirror.safe View Guide: Docker Container Failover
VMs and Containers Replication and Failover Podman mirror.safe View Guide: Podman Container Failover
VMs and Containers Replication and Failover Kubernetes K3S k3s.safe View Guide: Kubernetes K3S Replication
AWS Cloud Real-Time Replication and Failover AWS mirror.safe View Guide: AWS Replication Cluster
AWS Cloud Network Load Balancing and Failover AWS farm.safe View Guide: AWS Load Balancing Cluster
GCP Cloud Real-Time Replication and Failover GCP mirror.safe View Guide: GCP Replication Cluster
GCP Cloud Network Load Balancing and Failover GCP farm.safe View Guide: GCP Load Balancing Cluster
Azure Cloud Real-Time Replication and Failover Azure mirror.safe View Guide: Azure Replication Cluster
Azure Cloud Network Load Balancing and Failover Azure farm.safe View Guide: Azure Load Balancing Cluster
Physical Security / VMS Real-Time Replication and Failover Milestone XProtect milestone.safe View Guide: Milestone XProtect Failover
Physical Security / VMS Real-Time Replication and Failover Nedap AEOS nedap.safe View Guide: Nedap AEOS Failover
Physical Security / VMS Real-Time Replication and Failover Genetec (SQL Server) sqlserver.safe View Guide: Genetec SQL Failover
Physical Security / VMS Real-Time Replication and Failover Bosch AMS (Hyper-V) hyperv.safe View Guide: Bosch AMS Hyper-V Failover
Physical Security / VMS Real-Time Replication and Failover Bosch BIS (Hyper-V) hyperv.safe View Guide: Bosch BIS Hyper-V Failover
Physical Security / VMS Real-Time Replication and Failover Bosch BVMS (Hyper-V) hyperv.safe View Guide: Bosch BVMS Hyper-V Failover
Physical Security / VMS Real-Time Replication and Failover Hanwha Vision (Hyper-V) hyperv.safe View Guide: Hanwha Vision Hyper-V Failover
Physical Security / VMS Real-Time Replication and Failover Hanwha Wisenet (Hyper-V) hyperv.safe View Guide: Hanwha Wisenet Hyper-V Failover
Siemens Products Real-Time Replication and Failover Siemens Siveillance suite (Hyper-V) hyperv.safe View Guide: Siemens Siveillance HA
Siemens Products Real-Time Replication and Failover Siemens Desigo CC (Hyper-V) hyperv.safe View Guide: Siemens Desigo CC HA
Siemens Products Real-Time Replication and Failover Siemens Siveillance VMS SiveillanceVMS.safe View Guide: Siemens Siveillance VMS HA
Siemens Products Real-Time Replication and Failover Siemens SiPass (Hyper-V) hyperv.safe View Guide: Siemens SiPass HA
Siemens Products Real-Time Replication and Failover Siemens SIPORT (Hyper-V) hyperv.safe View Guide: Siemens SIPORT HA
Siemens Products Real-Time Replication and Failover Siemens SIMATIC PCS 7 (Hyper-V) hyperv.safe View Guide: SIMATIC PCS 7 HA
Siemens Products Real-Time Replication and Failover Siemens SIMATIC WinCC (Hyper-V) hyperv.safe View Guide: SIMATIC WinCC HA

Comparison of SafeKit with Traditional High Availability (HA) Clusters

How does SafeKit compare to traditional High Availability (HA) cluster solutions?

This comparison highlights the fundamental differences between SafeKit and traditional High Availability (HA) cluster solutions like Failover Clusters, Virtualization HA, and SQL Always-On. SafeKit is designed as a low-complexity, software-only solution for generic application redundancy, contrasting with the high complexity and specific storage requirements (shared storage, SAN) typical of traditional HA mechanisms.
Comparison of SafeKit with traditional High Availability (HA) clusters
Solutions Complexity Comments
Failover Cluster (Microsoft) High Specific Storage (shared storage, SAN)
Virtualization (VMware HA) High Specific Storage (shared storage, SAN, vSAN)
SQL Always-On (Microsoft) High Only SQL is redundant, requires SQL Enterprise Edition
Evidian SafeKit Low Simplest, generic and software-only. Unsuitable for large data replication.

SafeKit's Advantage in Application Redundancy

SafeKit achieves its low-complexity High Availability through a simple, software-based mirroring mechanism that eliminates the need for expensive, dedicated hardware like a SAN (Storage Area Network). This makes it a highly accessible solution for quickly implementing application redundancy without complex infrastructure changes.